Collective Redundancy Consultation: Woolworths Case

Daniel Barnett: The well-know USDAW v Woolworths case, in which HHJ McMullen held last year that the words ‘in one establishment’ should be ignored for the purpose of deciding whether collective consultation obligations are triggered by 20 or more people being made redundant within 90 days, has been referred by the Court of Appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Read more about the issues, and the EAT’s decision, here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s